October 6, 2009

Conservation genetic management is important for today’s dog breeds!

You might have seen, or at least you probably have heard, them in the forest helping the human hunter out. You might have seen them in small shapes on the farms hunting rats. And you have probably been amazed by how they put out the livestock to pasture. In the cities they seem to be everywhere, and in all shapes.

All dog breeds are unique and should therefore be conserved. The traditional approach in dog breeding is selective breeding. Selective breeding decreases genetic variation which is the foundation for adaptation. Mother Nature doesn’t do it this way. In nature the ones that are fit enough survive and have descendants. Selective breeding favors a certain kind of animal and thereby decreases the variation.

Genetic variation is the foundation of all biological diversity. Diversity is the only thing that really matters, if the environment of a wild animal (or the customer demand of buyers of domestic animals) changes, as genetic variation is necessary for adaptation. Of course, there is no goal in itself to conserve breeds, as there are, that have no use today or that are not healthy. And all breeds, regardless of original use, need to adapt mentally to the society of today.

The Convention on Biological Diversity implies that every country should conserve old breeds that make a cultural and biological contribution. Our traditional Swedish dog breeds are a cultural heritage. But why do we not make these breeds better? Why just conserve when we can improve the breeds? It all comes back to the genetic variation. Of course, we might want to change or improve some characters. But we can never afford losing the genetic variation; if we do, we have no basis for future development.

To lose a lot of genetic variation might be a short process; to get it back is almost impossible. The only way of getting new variation, without crossbreeding, is to sit and wait for the mutations. An argument against conservation of dog breeds is that small populations are unavoidably inbred. But the goal in conservation genetic management is always to increase the size of the populations as large population sizes are beneficial for genetic variation.

Without this variation, there is nothing left to adapt when things change. If we do not keep in mind that we need to conserve the variation within and between different dog breeds, we might lose the foundation for adaptation.

/Mija Jansson

August 1, 2009

Raskens first run in agility

June 17, 2009

Rasken in class III

I´ve come to realize that I do the serp in the wrong position and the end of the course is really bad. But we won and got our last Q.

This weekend Råttan competed in the Swedish Championships. We ended up in 17th place.

/Mija

May 12, 2009

SAg(hopp)Ch – the Movie

May 11, 2009

Råttan Jumping Ch & Raskens first Q in class 2

Wieeee! After eight years … Råttan finally became SAg(hopp)Ch yesturday. =)

Earlier this week Rasken did his first run in class II, and won!

Happy Regards Mija

April 13, 2009

Rasken in class II

This weekend we got our last Q. Here is an video of our last run i Class I. /Mija

April 6, 2009

Fuzzy tunnels

For those of you that do not know me I better start by telling that I try to follow Greg´s handling system.

I have got some theoretical issues with the tunnels.

ISSUE ONE is about the Lead Out Pivot. My first question is wheter it would be inconsistant to do a LOP att the end of a U-tunnel. Example:

skissmakaron

I understand that there are other ways to do it but I wonder if the LOP at the end of the tunnel are ok or not?

ISSUE TWO is about the tunnels in general, I have a problem with us not caring about positional ques of the frontcrosses when handling tunnels. For example in the AKC Invitational Final Course I quess everyone would handle 13 dog on right, rear cross 14 and then pick the dog up at right to the A-frame?

I feel like the “picking the dog up” is a front cross and it´s positional que should be at the A-frame, shouldn´t it?

One could argue that the dog dosn´t know because it is in the tunnel but we wouldn´t take that for an argument to blindcross for example, would we?

Help me I´m confused!

/Mija

March 15, 2009

Videos

Råttan:

Rasken:

/Mija